Quick Picks

- David No (데이빗 노)

- Photos (이미지)

- Video (비디오)

- Forged (포지드)

- Projects (프로젝트)

- Publicity (홍보)

- Contact Us (연락)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Genre Films: The Missing Link in Australian Filmmaking

By David No
3.dec.2001

Many of Australia ’s brightest filmmakers are attempting to make films across all genres, as is practiced in every other film industry in the world.  Yet it has become apparent that the Australian Industry has lost its confidence when it comes to trying something different.

 

The Australian film industry is just too safe and too insular.  This became evident at the recent 2001 SPAA (Screen Producers Association of Australia) Conference at the session entitled “Flirting with Genre: Can Australian films compete?”  It was disappointing to see the “can’t win - don’t try” attitude coming from the so-called panel of experts.  Martin Fabinyi (Mushroom Pictures) made the comment that Australian’s lack the technical wizardry to make such films.  Perhaps Fabinyi has not been aware of little films Australian crews have made such as: Mission Impossible 2; The Matrix (and subsequent sequels); and Star Wars Episode 2.  Even films like The Man From Hong Kong; Mad Max (and subsequent sequels); and more recently Moulin Rouge prove that we do have the talent and experience. 

 

Comments like these are not only insulting and belittling to Australian talent, but also reinforces the small minded perception Australian’s have of themselves.  Fabinyi may feel this way after Mushroom’s involvement in the Australian slasher movie Cut. However, the failings of Cut to perform domestically were not necessarily because it was a genre film. The audience for these films are well educated in genre lore.  Unfortunately for Cut, it appeared that the filmmakers had a lesser understanding of the genre than the audience it was made for. Even so, the domestic failings can be overlooked as the film did do well internationally. This is part of the magic of the genre films. Once transplanted outside it’s own culture and language, it’s basic themes are still conveyed through the language of the genre itself.

 

In the same seminar, an Australian expatriate Graeme Mason (Universal Pictures), defined Genre pictures as “American Films”, and that making a genre picture in Australia is merely an attempt at “emulating the Americans”.  Mason failed to acknowledge that every other film industry in the world makes films across all genres.  In France they have made films such as: La Femme Nikita (Thriller); Brotherhood of the Wolf (Horror-martial arts set in 16th Century France ); Taxi (action).  In fact La Femme Nikita inspired a Hong Kong interpretation of the same story (Black Cat) as well as a much less sophisticated remake in the US (The Assassin).  Does this mean that these films are all emulating the American’s – or in the case of Nikita, is it the other way around?

 

American filmmakers have a long history of re-interpreting films from around the world.  The Seven Samurai ( Japan ) became The Magnificent Seven; La Cage aux Folles (France) became The Birdcage.  City on Fire (HK) inspired the greatly successful Reservoir Dogs.  Yojimbo ( Japan ) inspired the Sergio Leone Italian classic A Fistful of Dollars, which is ironically considered a great American Western.  Australia ’s own Pricilla Queen of the Desert went on to inspire To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything, Julie Nemar, as Romper Stomper shares many similarities with American History X.

 

These are all examples of specific films that have inspired re-interpretations, but even more generally we can say that there are examples of most genres in every country.  The legend of the vampires has been remade countless times all across the world, including Australia in Thirst (1979).  Australia has had a history of genre pictures starting as early as 1910 with the bushranger movies.  It was in this era that Australia was regarded as the biggest filmmaking industry in the world.  During the 70’s and 80’s Australian’s enjoyed films like: The Man From Hong Kong (Martial Arts); Patrick (Horror); Mad Max (Action); Mad Max2 (Post Apocalyptic Action); Harlequin (Supernatural); Gallipoli (War); Death Cheaters (action); Dead Calm (Suspense). 

 

Today we have limited the scope of what we make to such an extent that an Australian Film is a Genre in itself (just look in the local video library).  This narrowing of scope very well may be a contributing factor to the poor attendance of Australian films by Australian audiences.  Only 8% of movie going audiences attended an Australian film last year (only 3% and 4% the previous years).  A stigma has now developed regarding Australian films, especially for younger audiences.  But does this mean the other 92% are actively supporting non-Australian films?  Hardly.  The audience has wide and varied tastes, and simply want to be entertained.  As Lyndon Barber noted, Shine is an example of a film that was “…less concerned about its national identity and more intrigued by universal themes – not what it means to be an Australian, but what it means to be human.” The same can be said for Lantana, with its success being attributed to a fantastic contemporary script and not from overly exaggerated Australian characters.

 

By not supporting Genre filmmaking in this country, we are choosing to make films for the 8%, instead of entertaining the masses.  And since nearly all Australian films are being made with government monies, it means as taxpayers we are funding films that many Australians will never see.

 

The Masters of Cinema

Some of the world’s greatest filmmakers have cut their teeth on Genre filmmaking.  James Cameron’s award winning epic love story Titanic was in its time the highest grossing movie in the world.  His feature film debut came from the low budget nasty Piranha II: Flying Killers.  His next film: The all-time classic sci-fi The Terminator.  Jonathan Demme (director of the Academy Award winning films Silence Of The Lambs and Philadelphia ) began his career with Crazy Mama and Caged Heat. Before Oliver Stone made the acclaimed political thriller JFK he made the horror Seizure.  Before Peter Jackson made Heavenly Creatures and the much anticipated Lord of the Rings, he began with Bad Taste, Meet the Feebles and Braindead (a director who incidentally has resisted Hollywood , and continues to work in New Zealand ).  Australia ’s Peter Weir (Dead Poets Society, Gallipoli) started with the horror flick The Cars that ate Paris .  Before Luc Besson made Joan of Arc he made the French sci-fi Le Dernier Combat. Similarly Jean Pierre Jeunet started in sci-fi before making this years acclaimed film Amelie from Montmatre. The list is endless: Frances Ford Coppola (Dementia 13); Martin Scorsese (Boxcar Bertha); Steven Spielberg (Duel).

 

The Hole in Education

So what does all this information mean?  Perhaps that genre films should be embraced in this country for several reasons:  It gives the audience a greater range of Australian films to view; it allows Australian to explore their own culture in various contexts; it gives our emerging filmmakers an important education in varying filmmaking techniques and styles, which they currently have to go overseas to seek. 

 

The Young Guns

It was very encouraging to see filmmakers respond in opposition to some of the remarks made in the above-mentioned seminar.  Magda Szubanski made an important comment regarding the fact that Australia has a history of not supporting its own talent: “We have some unique performers in this country, most of whom have to push their own barrow.” The success stories like Wogboy are from years of pushing.”  Currently there is a plethora of genre filmmakers attempting to get projects made.  Kel Dolan and David Allen (Rapid Fire Productions) made a vampire feature Reign in Darkness, but had to seek distribution in the states.  “We tried for ten years to get our stuff off the ground… …Now we have sold our film to territories such as France , Thailand , and Japan .” Their film still does not have distribution in its own country. 

 

Brent Houghton and myself (Furious Films) have battled to stay in Australia and have a stable of genre films in development hell. “It’s incredible how our work has a following around the world” Houghton explains, “We’ve been recognised on the streets in Cannes and in LA – and we haven’t even made a feature! It’s these passionate movie buffs which will give your film repeat business”.  Furious Films have been fortunate enough to have worked with the best of the best in action cinema including: Jackie Chan; Jet Li; Yuen Wo-Ping; Tsui Hark; and The Wachowski Brothers; and have attracted praise from the likes of John Woo and Peter Jackson. “People keep telling us to go overseas” Houghton adds “Call it idealism but there needs to be a change in the industry. There is a remarkable conflict between what the audience want to see and what the industry will back.”

 

Jamie Blanks is one filmmaker who did make the trip O.S. after a US talent scout snatched him from our own Victorian College of the Arts.  “Genre by its definition promises the audience it will deliver the required elements within a category,” Blanks explains.  (Which prompts the question: If Australian films have become a genre in themselves, what elements are they promising?) The horror genre specialist directed the US slasher flicks Urban Legend and Valentine, but prefers living in Melbourne when he isn’t filming. “Restricting the content of Australian films just prolong the frustration for filmmakers who are denied the opportunity to work within popular genres and stagnates diversity in Australian cinema.”

 

The Future

Genre filmmaking in Australia has managed to continue on a very small scale. Independent filmmakers battle with minuscule budgets based primarily on favours and deferred payment schemes, fighting against a perceived cultural snobbery and an economic environment and tax laws that discourages private investment in film. For the Australian film industry to truly flourish, both domestically and internationally, it will take more progressive decision making in the future. Filmmaking is not only about art: it is the ‘business’ of ‘entertaining’.  Australians deserve to be entertained by Australians, whatever their cultural interests.